班固著《汉书》，记述了西汉武帝以前的历史，部分内容沿用司马迁《史记》原文成书。后人对班固的这一做法颇有微辞，认为是《汉书》抄袭、剽窃了《史记》的成果。本文采用比较研究的方法，从4个方面入手，以事实论证抄袭、剽窃的说法与史实不符，值得商榷，并对此作出了重新评价。 Ban fixed the “Han”, describing the history of the Western Han Dynasty before the Wudi, some of the content used Sima Qian “Historical Records” into the original book. The descendants of Ban Gu this kind of practice is rather clichés, that is the “Han” plagiarism, plagiarism “Historical Records” results. This article uses a comparative study of methods, starting from four aspects, the fact that plagiarism and plagiarism is inconsistent with the historical facts, is open to question, and made a re-evaluation.