论文部分内容阅读
河北大部分方言中存在着与普通话一样的“(去1)+VP+去2”结构,但张家口、沧州、衡水、石家庄、保定、邢台、邯郸等地一些方言中与“(去1)+VP+去2”结构中“去2”对应的读音形式是[k]、[t]、[t]、[ti]、[li]、[l]、[i]等,文章分析认为这些读音形式其实是“去”的古音形式的遗留或进一步变化的结果,这些读音形式在句中的分布和地域的分布方面都显现出一定的特点。根据河北方言“去”的读音及语法性质,文章认为,“(去1)+VP+去2”结构中的“去2”仍是动词,但不是趋向动词。
In most dialects of Hebei, there exists the same structure as that of Putonghua, but in some dialects such as Zhangjiakou, Cangzhou, Hengshui, Shijiazhuang, Baoding, Xingtai and Handan, ) + VP + go to 2 “structure ” to 2 “corresponds to the pronunciation form is [k], [t], [t], [ti], [li], [l], [i] The analysis suggests that these pronunciation forms are actually the result of the remnants or further changes of the ancient forms of ”going“. These pronunciation forms show certain characteristics in the sentence distribution and geographical distribution. According to the phonetic and grammatical nature of Hebei dialect ”Go “, the article holds that ”Go 2 “ in ”(go to 1) + VP + go 2 " is still a verb, but not a verb.