论文部分内容阅读
关于先秦诸子所属学派的划分 ,历来就存在分岐。而对宋、尹文的学派属性 ,争议尤多 ,自先秦以降 ,众说纷纭 ,莫衷一是 ,总结起来有如下三种不同意见 :一、名家学派说 ,认定宋、尹文是名家学者 ;二、墨家学派说 ,认为宋、尹文是墨家后学 ,属于“别墨”的一支 ;三、道家黄老学派说 ,认为此二人是活动于稷下学宫的道家黄老学派的学者。宋、尹文究竟属于哪一学派呢 ?笔者认为应将此二人分而论之 :宋属墨家 ,尹归稷下道家黄老。
On the classification of the schools of pre-Qin philosophers, there has always been a division. However, there are many different opinions on the attributes of the schools of Song Dynasty and Yin Wen. Since the pre-Qin dynasties declined, there are many different opinions and different opinions. Summarizing, there are three different opinions as follows: First, the schools of masters say Song Yong and Yin Wen are masters and scholars; The Mohism School said that Song Yong and Yin Wen were later learned as Mohist School and that they belonged to the category of “Mo Mo”. Third, the Taoist Huang Lao school said that they were scholars of the Taoist Huang Lao School of the Jixia School . Song , Yin Wen what exactly belongs to a school? I believe that the two should be divided between: the Song is Mohist, Yin return Ji Road, under the Taoist yellow.