论文部分内容阅读
关于邮电业的性质问题,是个长期争论未决的问题。最近,朱高峰同志在《学习马克思主义经济理论,推动和发展邮电经济学》一文中,对此作了,很好的分析。作者强调指出,三十多年来,“由于对邮电业性质问题看法不一致,致使在研究确定邮电的各项方针政策时缺乏最基本的根据。”指出,“我国邮电业是以国家垄断为主体的、从事信息传递的公用企业。”这些观点,我完全赞同。但是,我不同意作者关于“邮电是物质生产部门”的提法。我认为,邮电业应该属于第三产业。
The nature of the post and telecommunications industry is a matter of long standing debate. Recently, Comrade Zhu Gaofeng made a very good analysis in his article “Studying Marxist Economic Theory, Promoting and Developing Post and Telecommunications Economics.” The author emphasizes that over the past 30 years, “due to the inconsistencies in the nature of the post and telecommunications industry, the basic and fundamental basis for determining the various guidelines and policies for post and telecommunications is lacking.” He pointed out: “China’s post and telecommunications industry is dominated by state monopolies Public utilities engaged in the delivery of information. ”These views, I fully agree. However, I do not agree with the author’s reference to “Posts and Telecommunications is the material production sector.” In my opinion, the post and telecommunications industry should belong to the tertiary industry.