论文部分内容阅读
近代中国商会的选举制度是其民主特征的具体反映,商会选举会员和领导层的制度安排和实际运作则略有差异。清末苏州商会的选举中还包括商会章程未作规定的某些制度安排,从而有利于经济实力雄厚的行帮。民初苏州商会的选举制度安排中减少了选举的层次,降低了会员入会的条件,扩大了有选举权和被选举权的会员人数,但选举的实际运作中仍有某些限制选举权的措施。实力雄厚的行帮首领依然主导商会的领导权,也开始有部分新兴工商企业代表当选进入领导层。商会的选举制度既受欧美、日本商会有关制度安排的影响,也对中国传统行会的选举制度有所继承;既体现了一定的民主原则,也反映了经济实力的较量。
The election system of the modern Chinese chamber of commerce is a concrete reflection of its democratic characteristics. The institutional arrangement and actual operation of the members and the leadership of the chamber of commerce are slightly different. The election of Suzhou Chamber of Commerce in the late Qing Dynasty also included certain institutional arrangements that were not prescribed in the charter of the Chamber of Commerce, which favored the economic strength. During the period of the Republic of China, the arrangement of electoral system in Suzhou Chamber of Commerce reduced the level of election, reduced the conditions for membership, expanded the number of members with the right to vote and the right to vote, but there were still some restrictions on voting in the actual operation of the election. The powerful leader of the gangs still led the leadership of chambers of commerce, and some emerging business representatives were also elected to the leadership. The election system of the Chamber of Commerce not only affected by the institutional arrangements of the European, American and Japanese chambers of commerce, but also inherited the election system of the Chinese traditional guild. It not only embodies certain democratic principles but also reflects the contest of economic power.