论文部分内容阅读
备受关注的“iPad商标权属纠纷”案随着深圳市中级人民法院的法槌落下而有了初步结果。虽然苹果公司已经提出上诉,案件的最终命运也有待审判,但是无论如何该案都将会成为中国知识产权保护史上的一个典型案例。该案焦点集中在两个协议上面:一个是台湾唯冠公司与英国IP公司签订的商标转让协议;另一个是英国IP公司与苹果公司签订的权利转让协议。在上述第一个协议中,商标转让协议的当事人是台湾唯冠公司和英国IP公司。深圳唯冠公司不是该商标转让协议的当事人,自然就没有义务履行该协议。虽然深圳唯冠公司和台湾唯冠公司具有关联关系,但是两者分别是独立的
Concern “iPad trademark ownership dispute ” case with the Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court dropped the gavel and have preliminary results. Although Apple has filed an appeal and the final fate of the case is yet to be determined, the case will in any case become a typical case in the history of intellectual property protection in China. The case focuses on two agreements: one is the trademark transfer agreement signed between Taiwan Proview and British IP; the other is the transfer of rights agreement signed between British IP and Apple. In the first agreement mentioned above, the parties to the trademark transfer agreement were ProView Corporation of Taiwan and IP Corporation of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Shenzhen Proview Corporation is not the parties to the trademark transfer agreement, naturally no obligation to fulfill the agreement. Although Shenzhen Proview Co., Ltd. and Taiwan Proview Corporation have an affiliation, but the two were independent