论文部分内容阅读
目的对传统手术与微创手术治疗小儿疝气的临床疗效进行比较分析。方法 54例疝气患儿,按照随机数字表的方式分为研究组和对照组,每组27例,研究组予以微创手术治疗,对照组则予以传统手术治疗,分析术后基本情况及并发症情况。结果研究组患儿的平均住院时间、手术时间、自主活动时间和出血量均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组并发症发生率为7.41%,对照组发生率为29.63%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论予以疝气患儿微创手术治疗,并发症少,术后恢复快,值得在临床广泛应用。
Objective To compare the clinical curative effect of traditional surgery and minimally invasive surgery in children with hernia. Methods 54 children with hernia were randomly divided into study group and control group according to random number table. Each group had 27 cases. The study group was treated by minimally invasive surgery while the control group was treated by traditional surgery. The basic postoperative complications and complications were analyzed. Happening. Results The average length of hospital stay, operation time, spontaneous activity time and bleeding volume in study group were better than those in control group (P <0.05). The incidence of complications in study group was 7.41%, and the incidence of control group Was 29.63%, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusions The minimally invasive surgery for children with hernia has fewer complications and quick recovery after operation. It is worth to be widely used clinically.