本届人大和政协会上,有不少代表、委员们说,有些议题似乎成了“永恒”的话题,例如,要求增加教育投资就是其中的一个。 三月二十九日上午,我在政协的民盟小组旁听,就听到张乔啬、孔令仁、张芝联、李树元等五位委员(还有一位委员我未查到其姓名)对一九八八年的教育投资未有明显的增加提出批评。张乔啬委员说,这次的《政府工作报告》又说要重视教育,但仍然是“口惠而实不至”。他提出,作预算计划时的先后秩序应是先按排好教育这样的人才生产的投资,再安排物质生产的投资。张芝联委员说,我们呼吁增加教育投资已经多年了,但为什么教育经费的增加是微乎其微呢?他说,原因是不是有二:一是我们的意见讲得还不够动情,因此不能打动人,那我们大家应该想办法说得更动情些(这时冯亦代委员插话说:那也不能花言巧语);二是 At this NPC and CPPCC, there are many delegates and members who said some issues seem to have become the topic of “eternity.” For example, asking for more investment in education is one of them. On the morning of March 29, I listened to the NLD Group of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) and heard reports from Zhang Qiaosi, Kong Lingren, Zhang Zhilian and Li Shuyuan and other five members (and one member I did not find out) Education investment did not significantly increase the criticism. Members of Qiao Jiali said that this time, the “Report on the Work of the Government” added that education should be given priority to, but it is still “oral treatment but not real”. He proposed that the order in which the budget plan should be made should first be based on investments made by highly qualified personnel such as education, and then to arrange investment in material production. Zhang Zhilian said that we have called for more investments in education for years. However, why the increase in education funding is negligible? He said that there are two reasons: First, our opinions are not sufficiently emotional and therefore can not touch people. Then we We should think of ways to say more emotionally (when Mr FUNG also said on behalf of the interlocutors that it can not be rhetorical); second is