《历代名画记》之《叙历代能画人名》一篇疑是伪作阑入 《历代名画记》卷一有《叙历代能画人名》一篇,徒录人名而不赞一字,体例颇与其余诸篇不合,且又与卷四以下历代画人评传犯复。《四库总目提要》病此篇之赘,遂谓此篇所录三百七十人,“既俱列传其后,则第一卷内所有姓名一篇,殊为繁复。疑其书初为三卷,但录画人姓名,后裒辑其事迹评论,续之于后,而未删其前之姓名一篇,故重出也。”言之似能成理。然《历代名画记》为张彦远之生平力作,自信其书“编次无差,铨量颇定”,何至任其复出互见,疏忽若此?近人 “History of famous paintings in mind,” the “name of the history of the past to write the name of the painting,” a suspicion of false entry into the “history of famous paintings in mind,” a volume, “Syria can write names” a passage, The rest of the disagreement, and volume IV with the following ancient painting criticism and rehabilitation. “Siku chief headlines” disease of this article of the superfluous, then that article recorded in this article three hundred and seventy, “both are listed afterwards, the first volume of all the names of one, is particularly complicated. For the three volumes, but the name of the recording artist, after the series of stories of its performance, continued in the later, without deleting the previous name of a, it is also re-born. However, ”History of Famous Paintings“ is a masterpiece of Zhang Yanyuan’s life, confident that his book ”no difference in the series, the amount of volume is quite determined," why the return of each other, negligence if this?