论文部分内容阅读
民主制度下的政府组织有义务将其掌管的社会公共资产的一部分投入到城市公共空间的营造和美化当中,目标是提高城市居民的生活质量。因此,公共艺术本质上应该归属于、服务于公众的社会福利事业。然而反观现实,我国公共艺术实践中却有大量的社会财富被以“公共”之名打了水漂或是进了私囊,给国家和社会造成了严重的资源浪费问题,这完全与我们所期望的“公共性”背道而驰。下面从国内最常见的公共雕塑和公共建筑案例中举例为证:
The government organizations under the democratic system are obliged to devote part of the social public assets under their control to the creation and beautification of urban public space with the goal of improving the quality of life of urban residents. Therefore, public art should essentially belong to the social welfare services that serve the public. However, on the contrary, in our practice of public art, a great deal of social wealth has been flooded or pocketed in the name of “public”, causing serious waste of resources to our country and society. This is exactly what we Expect “publicity ” runs counter to. The following examples from the most common public sculpture and public buildings in the country as examples: