论文部分内容阅读
当下的法律修辞学理论无视也无法处理修辞语境、听众理论和规范法学、法教义学的紧张关系。法律修辞学无法符合法律科学的一般范式,各种修辞图式和修辞方法也难以作为法律方法被运用。在法律修辞学的未来发展中,必须弱化听众理论的重要性,传统的修辞方法和论辩型式也需要按照规范法学、法教义学、法律方法论等的要求和特点改造成规范性的法律修辞规则。法律修辞规则是约束法律修辞者进行法律修辞活动的思维性规则和语用论辩规则,它是对特定法律论辩的规则化与体系化。法律修辞规则可为法律修辞学提供统一的科学范式,促成法治的要求在法律论辩中动态地实现、体系性思维和问题性思维间的融合,并且更利于论辩双方达成裁判结论上的合意。法律修辞规则在构造时必须遵守合法性原则、合理性原则和实用性原则。
The current legal rhetoric theory ignores and can not deal with the tension between the rhetorical context, the audience theory and the normative law and legal doctrines. Legal rhetoric can not meet the general paradigm of legal science, various rhetorical patterns and rhetorical methods are difficult to be used as a legal method. In the future development of legal rhetoric, the importance of audience theory must be weakened. The traditional rhetorical methods and argumentation patterns also need to be transformed into normative legal rhetorical rules in accordance with the requirements and features of normative jurisprudence, legal doctrine and legal methodology. Legal rhetoric rules are the rules of thinking and pragmatic argumentation rules that restrict the legal rhetoric activities of legal rhetoric. It is the rule and systematization of specific legal arguments. The legal rhetoric rules can provide a unified scientific paradigm for legal rhetoric, promote the realization of the rule of law dynamically in the legal argumentation, the fusion of the systemic thinking and the question thinking, and help the two parties reach agreement on the referee conclusion. Legal rhetoric rules must follow the principles of legitimacy, rationality and practicability when constructing.