援事立理就是平常所说的先举例子,再讲道理。虽说事实胜于雄辩,但只列举事实,不加分析,整篇文章就成了“故事会”。有时举完例子,自以为得计,但别人却不知道你举的例子和论点之间有什么关联。有的人也说了一两话,给例子贴一下标签。但这些不等于对事例进行了分析剖解。这些做法不但起不到论证论点的作用,反而使文章显得枯燥、乏味。缺少思辩的机智和幽默。凡事都有个方 Acting as the rule of law is commonly cited as an example first, to explain the truth. Although the facts speak louder than words, only by enumerating the facts and without analysis, the whole article becomes “the story.” There are times when an example is taken for granted, but others do not know the connection between the example you give and the argument. Some people also said a word or two, to the example stickers label. However, these do not mean that the examples were analyzed and analyzed. Not only do these practices fail to demonstrate the argument, they make the article seem dull and boring. Lack of speculative wit and humor. Everything has a party