论文部分内容阅读
近些年来,基于对传统以同行评议、引用量和转引率为主要评估指标的社会科学评价制度的不满,社会科学与现实世界的关联范围、程度和质量日益成为识别和判断研究成果质量的重要参照维度。然而不幸的是,无缘于世界,不仅是今日社会科学研究中的普遍现象,而且成为了制约社会科学研究发展的瓶颈。更为不幸的是,学术失缘于世界这一问题不仅没有引起学界的注意,而且在学术自由和学术自治的强势话语中被严重地遮蔽了。在这样的背景下,对学术失缘于世界这一问题的刻意关注就更具理论意义和实践价值:从理论上说,能够为反思社会科学研究提供新的视角和平台;从实践上说,能够为不断拓展和提升社会科学研究与现实世界的关联范围和程度理清思路、方法以及澄清必要的注意事项,进而才有可能提升社会科学研究的质量,才有可能为落实研究成果评价的绩效导向提供夯实的基础。
In recent years, based on dissatisfaction with the traditional evaluation system of social science based on peer review, citations and transfer rates, the scope, level and quality of social sciences and the real world are increasingly becoming important in identifying and judging the quality of research results Reference dimension. Unfortunately, however, being away from the world is not only a common phenomenon in social science research today, but also a bottleneck that restricts the development of social science research. What is even more unfortunate is that the issue of academic loss to the world not only failed to attract the attention of academic circles, but also was severely obscured in the strong discourse of academic freedom and academic autonomy. In this context, the deliberate concern about the academic loss of the world in the world is even more theoretical and practical: in theory, it can provide a new perspective and platform for reflection on social science research; in practice, It is possible to improve the performance of the research results in order to constantly expand and enhance the scope and extent of the connection between the social science research and the real world, to clarify the ways and means and clarify the necessary precautions so as to make it possible to improve the quality of social science research. Guided to provide a solid foundation.