论文部分内容阅读
国内外的文献表明,人们基于马克思“政治经济学不是工艺学”的论述得出结论:马克思不研究、不谈论工艺学;政治经济学和哲学中不包括工艺学内容;思想整体中也不存在工艺学思想。而兼顾思想史的文献梳理证明,马克思长期、艰苦和系统地研究工艺学,多次专门和相对系统地谈论工艺学,他的政治经济学和哲学中内在地包括工艺学内容。马克思的工艺学研究仅就哲学而言包括如下内容:第一,独具特色的生产力理论;第二,“特殊资本主义生产方式”理论;第三,生产力—生产方式—生产关系的历史唯物主义原理;第四,社会历史工艺决定论;第五,基于工艺决定论而来的社会历史层次论;第六,工艺学意义的社会历史深层客观基础论。误解马克思工艺学思想的后果是遗失上述哲学思想。
Literature at home and abroad shows that Marx’s conclusion based on Marx’s theory that “political economics is not technology” concludes: Marx does not study, does not talk about technology, political economics and philosophy do not include technology content, There is no technical thought. The combing of literature on history of thought shows that Marx studied the science of technology in a long-term, painstaking and systematic manner, talked exclusively and relatively systematically about the science of technology, and his political economy and philosophy inherently included the content of the science and technology. The study of Marxist technology includes only the following contents as far as philosophy is concerned: first, the unique theory of productive forces; second, the theory of “special capitalist mode of production”; thirdly, the productive forces-the mode of production-the history of the relations of production Materialist principle; fourth, social and historical process determinism; fifth, based on process determinism theory of social history; The consequence of misunderstanding Marxist technological thinking is the loss of the above philosophical thinking.