论文部分内容阅读
我国的收入转移可以从增加值、初次分配、再分配、总体分配这四个环节进行考察。在初次分配阶段,政府部门的正转移率非常高,说明政府部门在初次分配阶段,通过征收生产税净额,在补偿公共品生产的耗费之后,掌握了大量的剩余。在再分配阶段,政府部门的正转移率趋于提高,住户部门的正转移率趋于下降。在总体分配阶段,政府部门的正转移率在初次分配的基础上进一步提高。在1992-1999年,收入趋于分散。在2000-2008年,收入趋于集中。这反映了我国政府推动型经济的性质不仅没有转变,反而在不断强化。我国这种政府强力推动的经济,虽然在经济增长方面取得巨大成绩,但不可避免导致一系列严重问题,与中央政府提出的转变经济增长方式和转变政府职能的要求完全背道而驰。从原则上看,解决问题寄希望于:第一,加强制约政府增加收入的力量;第二,削弱政府高投资的意愿。
The transfer of income in our country can be investigated from the four aspects of added value, initial distribution, redistribution and overall distribution. In the initial distribution stage, the positive transfer rate of government departments is very high, indicating that in the initial distribution stage, the government departments have acquired a large amount of surplus through the collection of the net production tax and after compensating for the production cost of public goods. In the redistribution phase, the positive transfer rate of government departments tends to increase, and the positive transfer rate of the household sector tends to decrease. In the overall distribution phase, the positive transfer rate of government departments is further increased on the basis of initial distribution. In 1992-1999, income tended to diverge. In 2000-2008, income tends to be concentrated. This reflects that the nature of the government-driven economy in our country has not only not changed but has been continuously strengthened. Such a powerful economy promoted by the government of our country, despite its tremendous achievements in economic growth, inevitably leads to a series of serious problems in complete contradiction with the requirements put forward by the central government for changing the mode of economic growth and transforming government functions. In principle, the solution to the problem hopes: first, to strengthen the power of government to increase revenue; second, to weaken the government’s high investment will.