论文部分内容阅读
大约在八九年前,笔者曾写过一篇《过皇帝瘾》的短杂文,那是因为看到我们这个历史上盛产皇帝的国家,不少文艺作品(当然包括影视)和广告宣传对皇帝、后妃和皇族之类情有所钟,而且近于成癖,实在憋不住了,就写了那篇小文。之后这几年,也没少见对羡颂皇类的现象进行批评的报刊文字。当然如众所知的那样,那种“瘾”和“癖”绝没有因数篇不赞赏的文章见报便有所收敛,相反是愈演愈烈,有皇风席卷大地之势。不过,这倒也正好说明文学(尤其是短章文字)其力量是极有限的;恐怕就连那些文章的作者本也未奢望有多少人会拿着真当回事儿。说到底,只是不吐不快而已。最近,由于舆论宣传部门对
About eight or nine years ago, the author wrote a short essay on “emperors addicted to emperors” because when we saw the country that is rich in history in our history, many literary and art works (of course including films and television) , Empress and royal family like the bell, and nearly into a hobby, it really hold back, they wrote that small article. In the past few years, there have been few newspaper articles that criticized the phenomenon of envy of the emperor. Of course, as we all know, the “addiction” and “addiction” are far from converging due to the disapproval of a few articles. On the contrary, they are intensified with the rise of the imperial style sweeping the earth. This, however, shows that literature (especially the short form) has very limited powers; I am afraid even the authors of these articles did not expect how many people would take it for granted. After all, just do not vomit it. Recently, due to public opinion departments