论文部分内容阅读
目的：探究传统胸腔闭式引流与中心静脉导管治疗创伤性血胸的临床疗效对比。方法参照组患者采用传统胸腔闭式引流手术治疗，给予治疗组患者中心静脉导管手术治疗，对比分析两组患者治疗后的效果。结果治疗组患者在留管手术时间、手术切口愈合时间等均少于参照组，其并发症发生率与切口感染率明显低于参照组，总有效率(96.67%)高于参照组(93.03%)，两组差异显著。结论采用中心静脉导管治疗创伤性血胸的临床效果明显优于采用传统胸腔闭式引流治疗效果，具有临床应用价值。“,”Objective Explore traditional thoracic cavity closed drainage of central venous catheter in the treatment of traumatic hemothorax and clinical curative ef ect comparison.Methods The control group were treated by traditional closed chest drainage surgery,give treatment group patients with central venous catheter surgery,comparison and analysis the ef ect of two groups of patients after treatment.Results Treatment group in the indwel ing catheter in patients with operation time,incision healing time and so on are al less than the control group,the incidence of complications and incision infection rates significantly lower than the control group,the total ef ective rate (96.67%)than control group (93.03%),significant dif erence was found in two groups.Conclusion The central venous catheter in the treatment of traumatic hemothorax ef ect was bet er than the traditional closed chest drainage treatment ef ect,have clinical application value.