论文部分内容阅读
一、前言自从十九世纪初期,印度发现所谓野生大茶树以后,茶树原产地就引起许多争论。英国学者勃娄土(R.Bruce)拜通(E.A.Broun)主张原产地为印度;科恩司徒(Cohen etuert)主张原产地有二:大叶种产在西藏高原之东南部,即中国之四川,云南及印度,逻逻诸地;小叶种在中国东部及东南部。中国学者刘轸,陈龙馨等也同意科恩司徒的说法。英国学者否定茶树原产于中国,其唯一根据是我国西南无野生大茶树,东南均为小叶种。为了批驳上述论点,我国学者过去和现在都注意了野生大茶树的调查,在解放后则较有详细调查。1951年苏正同
I. INTRODUCTION Since the early nineteenth century when India discovered the so-called wild big tea tree, the origin of the tea tree has caused much controversy. The British scholar R. Bruce advocated the origin of India; Cohen etuert claimed two places of origin: large-leaf production in the southeast of the Tibetan plateau, namely, Sichuan, China, Yunnan and India, Logogs; leaflets in eastern and southeastern China. Chinese scholars Liu Zhen, Chen Longxin, also agree with Cohen Stuart’s argument. British scholars denied that the tea tree is native to China. Its sole basis is that there is no wild large tea tree in southwest China, and the southeast leaflet species. In order to refute these arguments, scholars in our country have paid attention to the investigation of wild large tea trees in the past and present, and have conducted more detailed investigations after the liberation. 1951 Su is the same