论文部分内容阅读
实证考察发现,S县常态纠纷的非司法解决体系有四个明显特征,即整体目标的统一性、解纷机构与方式的多样化、政府权力的主导性以及解纷机构的独立性。尽管这一纠纷解决体系能够较好地解决社会中发生的大多数纠纷矛盾,但也明显存在一些问题。从建构和谐社会与探索有效纠纷解决体系的目的出发,未来应该在认清纠纷发生态势、转变纠纷应对观念的基础上,围绕多元化的发展方向、纠纷当事人的主导性以及增进解纷机制之间联动性等三个方面完善常态纠纷的非司法解决体系,以期形成纠纷解决的中国模式。
The empirical study found that there are four distinct characteristics of the non-judicial solution to the normal disputes in S county, namely, the unity of the overall goal, the diversification of the institutions and ways of dispute settlement, the dominance of the government authority and the independence of the dispute settlement agencies. Although this dispute resolution system can better solve most of the disputes that occur in society, there are obviously some problems. From the perspective of building a harmonious society and exploring an effective dispute resolution system, in the future, on the basis of recognizing the trend of disputes and changing the conceptions of dispute resolution, and around the diversified development direction, the dominance of parties to disputes and the promotion of dispute resolution mechanisms Linkage and other three aspects of improving the normal dispute non-judicial solution system, with a view to the formation of dispute resolution of the Chinese model.