论文部分内容阅读
公孙龙的《坚白论》试图通过视觉和触觉的不同分工来证明坚与白各自独立,坚白石三者不能一体共存,只可说坚石或白石。这是用认识论的方法来证明存在论的问题。其中将坚、白普遍化而使之不限定于石头的倾向又是同《白马论》论中不定所白的思路是一脉相承的。《公孙龙子研究》中有所谓的“坚自体”和“白自体”以及“物自体不可知”的说法,似乎是将公孙龙比喻成康德,而这时不恰当的。庞先生在未能深入了解康德哲学的情况下,拿物自体的概念来比附公孙龙的坚白论,是对两者的双重误解,这种做法既是不严谨的,也是不正确的。
Kung-sun Lung’s “hard-core theory” tries to prove that the three independent entities and the independent whiteness can not coexist in one body by means of different division of vision and touch. Only the rock or white stone can be said. This is an epistemological approach to prove the issue of ontology. The tendency of generalizing the jin and the white not to be limited to the stone is in the same line of thinking as the indefinable in the theory of “white horse”. The so-called “firm self” and “white self” and “self-unknowable” in “Gongsun Longzi Study” seem to be the analogy of Kung-Sun Lung to Kant, which is not appropriate . Without a thorough understanding of Kant’s philosophy, Mr. Pang contrasted the concept of self-entity with that of Gongsun Long, which is a double misunderstanding of both. This is neither rigorous nor correct.