论文部分内容阅读
转型期的中国家庭一方面日益显示出脆弱和困顿,另一方面又始终保持着自身的活力和韧性。这种矛盾的状态只有放在家庭流动性的概念框架中才可以理解。“流动性”作为理解家庭的新框架,其中包含不同层面的含义:家庭在时空上的迁徙和变动,结构和形态上的多样性和复杂性,以及家庭关系和模式上的流动性和多元化。这些表现既有其社会结构和制度成因,也反映了与家庭相关的文化和价值观念的变革。与家庭流动性相关联的家庭概念和界定,更加强调家庭的关系视角、多元视角和建构视角,它突破了家庭在经典的现代化理论中被动的、固化的角色,而被赋予了某种实践性和主体性,因而既在家庭和社会研究中具有方法论价值,也在实践中具有重要的政策意义。缺失家庭流动性视角的社会政策,是一种有缺陷的社会治理思路。
On the one hand, the Chinese families in transition are increasingly showing their vulnerability and distress, and on the other hand, they have always maintained their vitality and resilience. This paradoxical state can only be understood in the conceptual framework of family mobility. “Liquidity ” as a new framework for understanding family, which contains different levels of meaning: family migration and changes in space and time, structural and morphological diversity and complexity, as well as family relations and patterns of liquidity and Diversification. These manifestations not only have their social structure and institutional causes, but also reflect changes in family-related culture and values. The concepts and definitions of family associated with family mobility emphasize more on the family relationship, diversification and construction perspectives. It breaks through the family’s passive and solid role in the classical modernization theory and is given some practicality And subjectivity, thus having both methodological value in family and social studies and important policy implications in practice. Social policies that lack family liquidity perspectives are a flawed thinking of social governance.