论文部分内容阅读
法理上分析民事与行政争议交叉案件,是正确构建该类案件处理机制的前提,学界对该问题的研究有待深入。民事与行政争议交叉案件应定位为两大争议在法律事实上有一定的关联,处理结果互为因果关系或者互为前提条件的一种案件形式且不以相互影响为必要;交叉案件可类型化为以民事争议为主涉及行政争议的交叉案件、以行政争议为主涉及民事争议的交叉案件、民事与行政争议并重且存在法律事实关联但判决结果相互不影响的案件三种;交叉案件的正确解决应当充分考虑两种诉讼机制的特征、诉讼目的及价值功能、司法权的性质等出发点,然后根据我国的国情和宪政体制,适当借鉴域外经验构建该类案件的妥当处理机制。
Jurisprudential analysis of civil and administrative cases of cross-border disputes is the premise for the correct construction of such cases handling mechanism, the academic research on the issue to be further. Cases of cross-over between civil and administrative disputes should be defined as the fact that the two controversies have a certain legal factual relationship, and it is necessary to deal with the result as a causal or reciprocal precondition and not affect each other. Cross-case cases can be typed It is a cross-cutting case involving civil disputes mainly involving administrative disputes. There are three cross-cutting cases involving administrative disputes mainly involving civil disputes. There are three cases where both civil and administrative controversies exist and there are legal facts but the judgments do not affect each other. The cross-case is correct The solution should take full account of the characteristics of the two litigation mechanisms, the purpose of the litigation and the function of value, the nature of the judicial power and other starting points. According to China’s national conditions and constitutional system, appropriate consideration should be given to the proper handling mechanism of such cases by drawing lessons from extraterritorial experience.