论文部分内容阅读
目的:对动态心电图与常规心电图诊断冠心病患者心律失常进行探究。方法:选择2014年7月-2015年7月我院收治的冠心病患60例。对60例患者均进行动态心电图与常规心电图的诊断。对两种诊断方法的阳性检出率及检测结果进行比较分析。结果:动态心电图的阳性检出率为60%,常规心电图的阳性检出率为48.3%,两者的差异无统计学意义,(P>0.05);动态心电图的室性早搏二、三联,房性早搏早发,房性早搏二、三联,房性早搏成对,短阵室上速的检出率都要明显高于常规心电图,两者的差异具有统计学意义,(P<0.05)。结论:动态心电图对心率失常的检出率要高于常规心电图,值得在临床上进行推广应用。
Objective: To investigate the arrhythmia of patients with coronary heart disease by dynamic electrocardiogram and conventional electrocardiogram. Methods: From July 2014 to July 2015, 60 patients with coronary heart disease admitted to our hospital were selected. 60 patients were diagnosed with Holter and conventional ECG. The positive detection rate of the two diagnostic methods and test results were compared. Results: The positive rate of ambulatory electrocardiogram was 60%, while the positive rate of routine electrocardiogram was 48.3%. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P> 0.05) Premature premature beats, premature atrial premature beats, triple, premature atrial premature beats, the detection rate of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia should be significantly higher than conventional ECG, the difference between the two has statistical significance (P <0.05). Conclusion: The detection rate of Holter monitoring of arrhythmia is higher than that of conventional electrocardiogram. It is worth to be popularized and applied clinically.