论文部分内容阅读
采用中国出版期刊、汉语语言、中国省级行政地区名及省会城市名等3种方法,对中国科技信息研究所采用“CS=CHINA”方法统计1995年EI光盘中中国论文进行了漏检弥补实验。结果表明:实验所综合的3种方法共检出中国论文8450篇,中国科技信息研究所检出的8109篇漏检341篇,漏检率为4%。并从论文作者、中国有关国标(GB7713-87)和中国期刊出版社及 EI公司等方面分析了造成漏检的原因。探讨了在 EI光盘用 CS=CHINA方法所漏检中国论文的弥补方法。
Using Chinese published periodicals, Chinese language, the names of provincial administrative regions in China and the name of the provincial capital city, three methods were used to undetect the Chinese papers published by China Science and Technology Information Institute using “CS = CHINA” method in 1995 EI CD Make up for the experiment. The results showed that 8450 Chinese papers were detected by the three methods synthesized by the experiment, and 8109 false negatives detected by China Science and Technology Information Institute were 341, with a missing detection rate of 4%. And analyzed the causes of missed inspections from the author of the paper, China’s national standard (GB7713-87) and China Journal Publishing House and EI companies. Discusses the remedies for Chinese papers missing by CS = CHINA method on EI CD.