论文部分内容阅读
诺斯的意识形态理论和哈耶克的道德进化论,都研究道德和伦理。两者的区别在于:意识形态概念的个体性与群体性,基本假设的“完全理性”和“有限理性”,制度变迁的主体意识性和自发秩序,意识形态的作用权重,不同的基本方法论等。前者对后者有明显的借鉴,两者相似之处有:理论出发点上均重视“文化”和“学习”的作用,基本假设上对“有限理性”的认识趋同,具体方法论上都注意博弈论的运用,哲学基础均是自由主义的世界观,一致认为意识形态是影响制度系统稳定与变迁的重要因素,得出了正式制度变迁应在意识形态框架内进行的结论。本文认为两者有综合的可能,并对制度变迁视角下意识形态理论的发展做了进一步的思考。
North’s ideology and Hayek’s theory of moral evolution, both moral and ethical research. The difference between the two lies in the individuality and colony of ideological concepts, the “complete rationality” and “bounded rationality” of basic hypotheses, the subject consciousness and spontaneous order of institutional change, the weight of ideology, and the different basic methodologies . The former has obvious reference to the latter. The similarities are: the role of “culture” and “learning” both in the theoretical starting point; the convergence of the understanding of “bounded rationality” in the basic assumptions and the game theory The philosophy foundation are all liberal world views. They all agree that ideology is an important factor that affects the system stability and change, and concludes that formal system changes should be carried out within the framework of ideology. This paper argues that there is an overall possibility of both, and further thinking about the development of ideology theory from the perspective of institutional change.