论文部分内容阅读
今年初最高人民法院发布有条件受理证券民事侵权赔偿案件以来 ,各地法院陆续受理此类案件。但是 ,最高人民法院的司法解释在案件的受理类型、前置程序、诉讼形式、诉讼时效等方面所作的规定 ,与法学理论存在着一些冲突 ,也未根本解决司法审判实践操作所遇到的困惑。文章以“司法最终解决”、方便当事人诉讼、保护证券投资者的权益等理念为基点 ,提出了一些制度性的建议。
Earlier this year, the Supreme People’s Court issued a conditional acceptance of securities infringement compensation cases, courts everywhere have successively accepted such cases. However, the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court has some conflicts with the jurisprudence in terms of the type of admissibility, pre-process, form of litigation and statute of limitations, nor does it fundamentally solve the confusion encountered in the practice of judicial adjudication . The article puts forward some institutional suggestions based on the concepts of “judicial final settlement”, litigant litigation convenience and protection of the rights and interests of securities investors.