论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨体位干预对妇科广泛性全宫切除术后腹腔引流量的影响。方法:采取2008年1月～2011年1月在我院行广泛性全宫切除术手术的患者36例,将患者随机分为观察组和对照组,每组各18例。对照组在患者术后采用常规护理方法,观察组患者则在术后进行体位干预。详细记录两组患者置管时间、引流液总量、术后住院天数,并进行比较。结果:观察组与对照组比较,平均置管天数观察组为(3.21±0.71)d,对照组为(2.69±0.75)d;引流总量观察组为(321.99±73.70)ml,对照组为(216.05±57.25)ml;住院天数观察组为(5.16±1.48)d,对照组为(4.54±1.24)d。两组比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论:体位干预能有效的在妇科广泛性全宫切除术中提高术后腹腔引流效果,临床可以广泛应用并推广。
Objective: To investigate the effect of body position intervention on the amount of abdominal drainage after gynecological general hysterectomy. Methods: Totally 36 patients undergoing total hysterectomy in our hospital from January 2008 to January 2011 were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 18 cases in each group. The patients in the control group were treated with routine nursing methods, and the patients in the observation group were given postoperative posture interventions. Detailed records of two groups of patients catheterization time, total drainage, postoperative hospital days, and compared. Results: Compared with the control group, the mean days of catheterization in the observation group was (3.21 ± 0.71) days and in the control group was (2.69 ± 0.75) days; the total drainage volume was (321.99 ± 73.70) ml in the observation group and 216.05 ± 57.25) ml. The days of hospitalization were (5.16 ± 1.48) days in the observation group and (4.54 ± 1.24) days in the control group. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (both P <0.05). Conclusion: Postural intervention can effectively improve the postoperative abdominal drainage in gynecological general hysterectomy. Clinical application can be widely applied and popularized.