直观看来,既然民营快递公司挤占了传统邮政的优质客源,那么就有“义务”从其利润中提取部分邮政普遍服务基金。但实际上,这一思路混淆了商业与公益的边界,以行政指令干预自由市场的意图明显。邮政普遍服务、尤其是偏远山区通信服务是政府为保障公民基本通信权利而提供的公益性业务,具有业务多、任务重、利润低的特征,是天然的公共产品。倘若将公益性邮政普遍服务的运营成本强加于所有经营主体,只会削弱市场活力,缓滞快递行业自我 Intuitively, since private couriers squeeze out the high-quality source of traditional postal services, there is a “voluntary obligation” to extract some of the postal universal service funds from their profits. However, in fact, this idea has confused the border between commerce and public welfare and the intention of intervening in the free market with administrative instructions is obvious. Universal service for postal services, especially for remote mountainous areas, is a public service provided by the government for the protection of citizens’ basic communications rights. It has the characteristics of more business, heavier tasks and lower profits, and is a natural public product. Imposing the operating costs of the universal service of public service on all operators will only weaken the vitality of the market and slow down the self-service of the express delivery industry