论文部分内容阅读
目的:探析采用布地奈德雾化吸入治疗方法来治疗小儿肺炎患者的临床效果。方法:选择我院于2013年2月至2014年2月期间收治的82例小儿肺炎患者作为研究对象,采用随机分配的方法将以上患者随机分为观察组和对照组。对照组患儿采用常规综合治疗的方法,观察组患儿在常规综合治疗的前提下再进行布地奈德雾化吸入治疗,比较两组患儿的治疗有效率、临床症状消失所用的时间以及住院时间等。结果:观察组患儿的治疗总有效率为87.80%,对照组患儿的治疗总有效率为51.22%。观察组患儿在咳嗽、湿罗音方面与对照组患儿的比较差异性不大,但是在气喘症状的缓解、肺部哮鸣等症状体征的消失时间以及患者住院时间方面与对照组相比具有明显差异,两组比较均具有统计学意义。结论:布地奈德雾化吸入治疗方法在临床小儿肺炎患者的治疗中有着显著的效果,尤其是在消除患者的气喘以及肺部哮鸣音方面,可以有效弥补常规综合治疗方法的不足,缩短消除患者以上症状的时间。并且,由于使用量较少,因此该治疗方法的不良反应也比较小,可以缩短患者的住院时间,具有较大的临床效果,值得大力推广。
Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of budesonide inhalation therapy in children with pneumonia. Methods: A total of 82 cases of pediatric pneumonia admitted from February 2013 to February 2014 in our hospital were selected as research objects. The above patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group by random distribution method. The control group of children with conventional comprehensive treatment of children in the observation group under the premise of conventional comprehensive treatment of budesonide inhalation therapy, the treatment of children in two groups were compared, the disappearance of clinical symptoms time and hospitalization Time and so on. Results: The total effective rate was 87.80% in the observation group and 51.22% in the control group. Compared with the control group, children in the observation group were not significantly different in cough and wet rales compared with those in the control group. However, compared with the control group, there was no significant difference between the observation group and the control group in the relief of asthma symptoms, the disappearance of symptoms and signs such as lung wheezing, There are significant differences between the two groups were statistically significant. Conclusion: Budesonide inhalation therapy has significant effect in the treatment of children with clinical pneumonia, especially in the elimination of asthma in patients and lung wheezing, which can effectively make up for the lack of conventional comprehensive treatment and shorten the elimination Patient time above symptoms. And, due to less dosage, the adverse reactions of this treatment method are also relatively small, which can shorten the hospitalization time of patients and have a great clinical effect, so it is worth to be vigorously promoted.