论文部分内容阅读
判断聚合悖论通过把法理悖论逐步一般化,指出:不存在符合一定理性条件的聚合规则,保证从个体判断得到一致的集体判断。判断聚合理论提出解决悖论的核心是集体能动者,然而该理论对集体能动者的概念澄清及其实在性的论证存在问题:(1)在概念澄清上借用丹尼特的意向立场并不能实现简单集体和集体能动者的区分;(2)未能说明集体能动者为何具有推理能力;(3)基于常识论证集体能动者的实在性,未能澄清方法论个体主义与本体论上的取消主义的关系。
Judging Aggregation Paradox By gradually generalizing the legal paradox, it is pointed out that there is no aggregation rule that conforms to certain rational conditions and that a collective judgment can be obtained from individual judgment. However, this theory has some problems on the conceptual clarification of the collective agent and its substantive argument: (1) It is impossible to borrow Dennett’s intentional position on the conceptual clarification (2) failing to explain why collective agents have the ability to reason; (3) arguing that the collective agent’s reality based on common sense fails to clarify the cancellation of methodological individualism and ontology relationship.