近来很多教育工作者提出全面發展与因材施教有矛盾,而且列举不少事例为証。我認为这兩者不应該有矛盾,也不会發生矛盾。除非它們之間的关系沒有摆得恰当,或者对它們發生了某些誤解,因而在实际执行中遇到若干困难,發生若干疑问,就以为两者有矛盾。全面發展和因材施教一般地说都是属于教育方針性的,倘若严格地来区别,全面发展是教育要求,而因材施教是教育方法(不仅仅是教学法)。前者是培养学生的目标,后者是教师应該如何培养学生。这兩者之间,应该結合,可以結合,而且只有很好的结合,才能堵养出合乎国家要求的人才。說一个比喻吧。我們办任何一件事,处理任何一个问题,总有这么兩方面:一方向是主观的要求,另一方面是按照各种具体条件,来拟訂办法和实施步驟,然后再按照客 Recently, many educators put forward the contradiction between the all-round development and teaching students according to their aptitudes, and cite a lot of examples as evidence. I think there should be no contradiction between the two and there should be no contradiction. Unless the relations between them are not properly placed or some misunderstandings have occurred on them, some difficulties have been encountered in the actual implementation. When there are a number of doubts, the two are contradictory. To develop in an all-round way and teach students in accordance with their aptitudes are generally educational principles. If they are strictly differentiated, all-round development is an educational requirement, and teaching students according to their aptitude is an educational method (not just pedagogy). The former is the goal of training students, the latter is how teachers should train students. Between the two should be combined, can be combined, and only a very good combination, in order to plug the cultivation of qualified personnel in line with national requirements. Let’s say a metaphor There are always two aspects in handling any one of our problems: one direction is the subjective requirement and the other is the formulation of measures and implementation steps according to various specific conditions,