我始终反对“哲理诗”的提法。一些人写了三两句似是而非莫名其妙的句子,然后堂而皇之地冠之以“哲理诗”的名字,着实让人眼晕。不单因为此。最主要的原因,是我以为诗歌在诗歌的角度,是感性的,是高于哲理的。但我并没有说,哲理就根本不能在诗歌中存在。露斯·斯通的诗歌就是这样,她将哲理巧妙而自然地溶入她强有力的诗歌之中,从而在某种程度上完成了对哲理的超越。请读者朋友来评价吧。——五木 I have always opposed “Philosophical Poems,” the formulation. Some people have written a few sentences that seem rather than inexplicable, and then imposing the name of “philosophical poem” openly, which really makes people feel dizzy. Not only because of this. The main reason is that I think poetry is sensual in poetry and higher than philosophy. But I did not say that philosophy can not exist in poetry at all. That was the case with Rosstone’s poetry, who subtly translated philosophy into her powerful poetry and, to a certain extent, transcended her philosophy. Readers friends to evaluate it. - Five wood