文章回顾了关于汉语结构助词“底”来源的研究,指出了前人研究中存在的问题与不足,主张“底”来源于“者”。这一观点跟吕叔湘先生看法的不同之处是:文章认为探讨“底”的来源,既要考虑它的转指用法,也要考虑它的自指用法,必须两者兼顾;“底”和“者”在语法功能上存在高度的一致性,在语音上也存在明显的演变关系。 The article reviews the research on the sources of Chinese structural auxiliary particles and the “endings”, points out the problems and shortcomings existing in previous studies, and advocates that the “end” derives from “person ”. The difference between this view and Mr Lv Shuxiang’s point of view is that the article considers that to explore the origin of “bottom ”, we must consider both its usage of reference and its self-indicated usage and must take both into consideration “And ” person "are highly consistent in their grammatical functions, and there is also a clear evolutionary relationship between phonetics and pronunciation.