论文部分内容阅读
目的比较冷光源BT-400与普通蓝光灯治疗新生儿黄疸的疗效。方法符合光疗指征并且直接胆红素基本在正常范围,仅以间接胆红素升高为主的新生儿黄疸23例予以蓝光灯治疗,29例予以冷光源治疗,两组均每天间断照射12h以上[1],48小时后观察两者疗效。结果两组患儿胎龄、日龄、性别、体重及病因等无显著性差异,但总胆红素值在光疗前后比较差异有显著性。结论冷光源光疗较普通蓝光灯治疗具有更好的临床退黄效果,不含紫外线和红外线,有效减少对患儿皮肤的损伤,临床操作方便,值得推广。
Objective To compare the efficacy of cold light source BT-400 and ordinary blue light in the treatment of neonatal jaundice. Methods According to the indications of phototherapy and direct bilirubin in the normal range, only indirect bilirubin-induced neonatal jaundice in 23 cases were treated with blue light, 29 cases were treated with cold light, both groups were intermittently irradiated 12h The above [1], 48 hours after the observation of both curative effect. Results There was no significant difference in gestational age, age, sex, body weight and etiology among the two groups of children, but the total bilirubin value was significantly different before and after phototherapy. Conclusion Cold light source phototherapy has a better effect of clinical rehmannia than ordinary blue light treatment. It does not contain ultraviolet and infrared rays and can effectively reduce the damage to children’s skin. It is worthy of clinical application.