本文是对旧作《从早期汉译佛典看中古表方所的指示代词》一文的深化和补充。本文认为,中古汉语的处所指代结构除近指、远指两种类型外,还有旁指和遍指;而且形式多样,即使是近指和远指,也远不止以前所谈到的六种形式。从结构形式来看,中古汉语的处所指代结构大多由两部分复合而成(遍指除外):指代成分+处所标记,处所标记又分两种:一般处所标记和方位标记。但并非所有的指代成分跟所有的处所标记可以任意两两搭配,构成处所指代结构,同形异构现象会影响处所指代结构的形成。这些处所指代结构应该被赋予“词”的身份和地位,为《汉语大词典》所收録。最后,对这些专门处所指代结构的产生原因进行推阐,认为它们的产生跟西周时期汉语出现专门的处所询问代词系统有关。 This article is the deepening and supplementing of the old version of “Demonstrative Pronouns from the Perspective of Early Chinese Translation of Buddhist Scriptures”. This paper argues that the place of reference in medieval Chinese refers to the structure in addition to the near finger, pointing far to the two types, there are side means and means; and various forms, even the proximal and distal means, but also far beyond the previously mentioned Six forms. From the perspective of structural form, most of the Chinese-speaking places refer to structures that are mostly composed of two parts (except the pass points): referring to the composition + the place mark, and the place mark in two ways: the general place mark and the bearing mark. However, not all the reference components can be matched with all the placemarks, and the place constitutes the reference to the structure. The phenomenon of the same form and the like affects the formation of the structure referred to by the place. These places refer to the structure should be given “word ” identity and status for the “Chinese Dictionary” included. Finally, the author explains the causes of the structures referred to in these special places, and concludes that their production has something to do with the interrogation pronouns system in the special places of Chinese in the Western Zhou Dynasty.