滑稽模仿在我国的法律地位尚不明确.滑稽模仿能否被认定为合理使用存在理论上的争议.建议将一定的滑稽模仿纳入合理使用的范畴,在具体认定时,综合考虑四个要素:使用的目的和性质、原作的性质,使用的数量、对原作价值和市场的影响.同时应进一步完善关于保护作品完整权的规定. The legal status of parody in our country is not yet clear.If there is theoretical controversy on whether parody can be regarded as fair use, it is suggested that some parody should be included into the category of fair use, and four factors should be considered in the concrete identification: The nature and nature of the original work, the quantity used, the effect on the original work value and the market, and at the same time, further provisions on the protection of the complete rights of the work should be further perfected.