论文部分内容阅读
一当前,监察机关在行使监察权开展反腐败促廉政的工作过程中,由于缺乏应有的法律依据和可靠的法律保障,其工作虽有显著成绩,但常常遇到阻碍和干扰。其原因多种多样,最根本的是没有确立监察权的宪法地位。我们知道,中华人民共和国的执法权主要分为两类,一是司法权,如审判机关的审判权,检察机关的检察权;二是行政执法权,如审计机关的审计监督权,监察机关的行政监察权,税务部门的税收执法权等。我国宪法对两类执法权中的审判权、检察权和审计监督杈的法律地位都有明文规定,例如,宪法第126条现定:“人民法院依照法律规定独立行使审判权,不受行政机关、社会团体和个人的干涉。”第131条规定:“人民检察院依照法律规定独立行使检察权,不受行政机关、社会团体及个人的干涉。”
At present, in the process of exercising the right of supervision to carry out anti-corruption and promote clean government, the supervisory organ often encounters obstacles and disruptions due to its notable legal basis and sound legal guarantees in spite of notable achievements. There are many reasons for this. The most fundamental reason is that there is no constitutional status for establishing the power of supervision. We know that the law enforcement powers of the People’s Republic of China are mainly divided into two categories. One is judicial power, such as the judicial power of the judicial authority and the procuratorial power of the procuratorial organs. The second is the power of administrative enforcement, such as the audit supervision power of the audit institutions, Administrative supervision, the tax department tax enforcement powers. For example, article 126 of the Constitution now reads: “People’s courts independently exercise their judicial power in accordance with the law and are not subject to any restrictions on the status of the judicial organs, prosecutors and auditors. , Social groups and individuals. ”Article 131 stipulates:“ People’s procuratorates shall exercise independent procuratorial power in accordance with the law and shall not be subject to interference by administrative organs, social organizations or individuals. ”