论文部分内容阅读
德国民法一向以严谨著称,德国立法者在《德国民法典》中关于“动物不是物”的相关规定引发了我国法律界关于动物法律地位的热烈探讨。该篇论文从理论和实践两个方面分析动物不可能成为法律关系的主体。在综合各位学者意见之后,表明特殊主体说和义务说的优势。最后落脚于问题的关键在于我国对保护动物的相关立法有所缺失,我们对动物的保护刻不容缓,无论动物处于什么位置,均不会影响到我们对其的保护。完善相关立法,健全对动物保护的制度才是当务之急。
The German civil law has always been known for its rigorousness. The relevant provisions of the German Civil Code in the German Civil Code on “Animal is not an Object” provoked a heated discussion on the legal status of animals in our country. This paper analyzes the animals from two aspects of theory and practice can not become the main body of the legal relationship. After synthesizing the opinions of all scholars, it shows the superiority of the theory and obligation of the special subject. Finally, the crux of the matter lies in our country’s lack of relevant legislation on the protection of animals. Our protection of animals is an urgent matter. No matter where the animals are, they will not affect our protection. Improve the relevant legislation, improve the system of animal protection is the top priority.