论文部分内容阅读
3月13日。在被内蒙古蒙药股份有限公司状告侵犯商标权之后,同仁堂向外界公开表示,所谓侵权案毫无实际意义,完全是一种炒作。 内蒙古蒙药股份有限公司以同仁堂售卖的两种药品商标类似于他们享有专利的药品商标为由,将商标侵权方和北京同仁堂一同告上北京市第一中级人民法院,同时被告的还有生产该药品的内蒙古库伦蒙药厂。 同仁堂有关负责人称,这起官司毫无实际意义,同仁堂是正常进货,符合药品流通的各种手续,在法律上一点也输不了。
March 13. After being sued by Inner Mongolia Mongolian Medicine Co., Ltd. for trademark infringement, Tong Ren Tang made it clear to the outside world that the alleged infringement case is of no real significance and is entirely a speculation. Inner Mongolia Mongolian Medicine Co., Ltd. sold two kinds of pharmaceutical trademarks at Tong Ren Tang similar to their patented drug trademark on the grounds that the trademark infringer and Beijing Tong Ren Tang were summoned to Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court, while the defendant also produced the drug Inner Mongolia Cullen Mongolian medicine factory. Tong Ren Tang official said the lawsuit has no real meaning, Tong Ren Tang is the normal purchase, in line with the circulation of drugs in various formalities, the law can not even lose.