近年有一种大胆推测(只能说是推测,并无实质性根据):根本没有“脂砚斋”其人,这只是同治时刘铨福的“化名”,“脂评”乃是刘的“伪托”,毫无价值.这个推测的悬揣性未免太大,并不足以一笔勾销“脂砚斋”与“脂评”,倒是提醒了一点:必须重视脂评的存在,必须充分评价脂评的价值. In recent years, there is a bold speculation (can only be said to speculate, there is no substantive basis): There is no “fat Yan vegetarian” people, this is only the Tongzhi Liu Quanfu “pseudonym”, “fat” is Liu’s “false care” , Worthless.This conjecture is too much to suspense too much, not enough to write off “Zhi Yanzhai” and “grease”, it touches on the point: you must pay attention to the existence of lipid evaluation, you must fully evaluate the value of lipid evaluation.