目的 :了解演习各阶段舰员应激反应的特点 ,为探讨防治过度应激反应的措施提供依据。方法 :采用SCL 90症状自评量表和应激评定量表 ,对 4 0名舰员进行问卷调查。结果 :SCL 90症状自评量表各因子分演习前、演习中比平时显著增高 (P <0 .0 1或P <0 .0 5 ) ,演习后与演习前比较 ,各因子分显著降低 (P <0 .0 1或P <0 .0 5 )。演习不同阶段应激反应状态由高到低顺序为演习中、演习前、演习后。应激评定量表的各因子分值与SCL 90的焦虑、抑郁、躯体化因子分值呈显著性正相关。结论 :在模拟实战的演习中 ,舰员发生了一过性的高度应激反应状态。在评定应激反应状态方面 ,应激评定量表与SCL 90症状自评量表具有相同的价值 Objective: To understand the characteristics of the stress response of seafarers at all stages of the exercise, and to provide evidence for the prevention and treatment of excessive stress response. Methods: SCL 90 symptoms self-rating scale and stress rating scale were used to survey 40 sailors. Results: Before and after exercise, each factor of SCL 90 symptom self-rating scale was significantly higher than usual (P <0.01 or P <0.05), and each factor was significantly lower than that before exercise P <0. 01 or P <0. 05). Different stages of exercise stress response from high to low order for the exercise, before the exercise, after the exercise. The stress score of each factor scores and SCL 90 anxiety, depression, somatization factor score was significantly positive correlation. Conclusion: During the simulated actual combat exercise, the crew members experienced a transient state of high stress response. In assessing the state of stress response, the Stress Rating Scale has the same value as the SCL 90 Symptom Self-rating Scale