论文部分内容阅读
目的以军人为被试对象自编《军人状态焦虑预测量表》(简称《量表》),用以评估不同应激条件下军人状态焦虑程度,从而为有针对性地干预奠定基础。方法选取陆军某部队的3340名军人进行测评,回收有效问卷2890份,对《量表》进行信度、效度等分析。结果《量表》包括负性思维、焦虑特质、躯体性感受、人格品质4个因子,共38个条目。《量表》四因子具有良好的结构,数据与假设模型拟合程度较高,其拟合指数分别为2/df=14.36,AGFI=0.782,CFI=0.94,NNFI=0.94,NFI=0.94,RMSEA=0.08,IFI=0.94。负性思维、焦虑特质、躯体性感受、人格品质之间不相关。总量表同质信度克朗巴赫系数α(Cronbach’sα)为0.905,折半信度Guttman系数为0.67,Spearman-Brown系数为0.728。结构效度KMO值为0.964(P<0.0001)。《量表》各因素与状态-特质问卷(S-TAI)有较好相关性。结论该《量表》适应现代军事应激条件,结构清晰,操作简便,更是适用于预测军人状态焦虑的有效心理健康测评工具。
Objective To prepare the military status anxiety prediction scale (abbreviated as “scale”) with military personnel as the test subjects to assess the state anxiety of military personnel under different stress conditions, so as to lay the foundation for the targeted intervention. Methods A total of 3,340 troops from a certain army were selected for evaluation. 2890 valid questionnaires were collected and the reliability and validity of the scale were analyzed. Results “scale” includes negative thinking, anxiety traits, physical feelings, personality qualities four factors, a total of 38 entries. The four factors of the “scale” have a good structure, and the fitted data and the hypothetical model have a high degree of fitting. The fit indices are 2 / df = 14.36, AGFI = 0.782, CFI = 0.94, NNFI = 0.94, NFI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.08, IFI = 0.94. Negative thinking, anxiety traits, physical feelings, personal qualities are not related. The Cronbach’s α is 0.905, the half-confidence Guttman’s coefficient is 0.67, and the Spearman-Brown’s coefficient is 0.728. The structural validity KMO value was 0.964 (P <0.0001). The “scale” of each factor and status - quality of questionnaire (S-TAI) has a good correlation. Conclusion The “scale” adapts to the conditions of modern military stress and has a clear structure and easy operation. It is also an effective mental health assessment tool for predicting the status anxiety of military personnel.