论文部分内容阅读
虽然产权界定明确主办单位不拥有金利源公司的任何股权及其相应的所有者权益,但是其法律效力却没能约束葛洲坝集团财务部的“变脸”葛洲坝集团财务部是否存在侵占金利源公司的嫌疑和事实,关键要看金利源公司的企业性质。令人不解的是,既然1997年底,金利源公司已经做过产权界定,且产权界定的结果是,金利源公司为“其它投资者投入”即私人投入。那么,为何葛洲坝集团财务部却在事实上认为其是金利源公司的投资单位呢?而采访中,葛洲坝集团财务部也一直未给《法人》一个合理的解释。
Although the property rights make it clear that the organizer does not own any equity interest in Jinliyuan Company and its corresponding owners’ rights, its legal effect fails to restrict the “change of face” of Gezhouba Financial Group to the suspicion of appropriating Jinliyuan Company And the fact that the key depends on the nature of Jinliyuan company’s business. What is puzzling is that since the end of 1997, Jinliyuan company has done the definition of property rights, and property rights as a result of the definition, Jinliyuan company for “other investors” or private investment. So, why Gezhouba Group Finance Department actually think it is Jinliyuan company’s investment unit? In the interview, Gezhouba Group Finance Department has also been to “legal persons” a reasonable explanation.