论文部分内容阅读
对某些有重大作案嫌疑,但是暂时缺乏有力的直接证据证明其作案的人,称其为无定案证据刑事嫌疑人。侦查实践中加强对这一问题的研究具有重要的现实意义。对无定案证据刑事嫌疑人的审查应坚持合法性、客观性、比例性和保密性的原则。审查方法可从以下5个方面进行:从程序角度对审查方法进行研究;转变传统的侦查模式,克服“重口供、轻物证”的思维,多从嫌疑人外围展开工作;完善相关的法律规定,增强政策的感召力、同化力;从调查性询问中找突破口;合理利用侦查测谎技术。
For some suspects who are suspected of committing crimes, but who temporarily lack strong direct evidence that they commit crimes, they call them criminal suspects without evidence of a verdict. It is of great practical significance to strengthen the research on this issue in the investigation practice. The review of criminal suspects without evidence of indefiniteness should uphold the principle of legality, objectivity, proportionality and confidentiality. The review method can be carried out from the following five aspects: from the procedural point of view of the review method; to change the traditional mode of investigation to overcome the “retributive, light evidence” of thinking, and more from the suspect to work outside; improve the relevant legal provisions, Enhance the appeal of the policy and assimilation force; find a breakthrough from the investigation inquisition; and make rational use of the technology of detective polygraph.