论文部分内容阅读
关于秘书工作的本质属性问题,前些年秘书学界曾对此进行了卓有成效的探讨。近年来秘书学刊物上已较少有人专门对此问题发表论述,似乎认识已经统一,已无探讨的必要了。其实,秘书学界对这一问题远未形成共识。例如,刘峰同志在《秘书之友》1995年第9期发表的《关于对秘书“谋”的再认识》一文中说:“与智囊、咨询机构的专家、学者相比较,秘书的‘谋’是从属性
On the essential nature of the secretary’s work, a few years ago, the secretary academics had conducted fruitful discussions on this issue. In recent years, there has been relatively few publications on the journal of secretary studies that have been published specifically for this issue. It seems that understanding has been reunified and there is no need to discuss it. In fact, the secretary academics have far to reach a consensus on this issue. For example, Comrade Liu Feng said in his article “Re-understanding of the Secretary,” published in the “Friends of the Secretary,” No. 9, 1995, “Comrade Liu Feng said:” Compared with experts and scholars in think tanks and advisory bodies, the secretary’s conspiracy ’Is a dependency