论文部分内容阅读
风格,是一种表现者或创造者采取或应采取的独特和可辨的方式,含意非常庞杂。比如当我们提到“法国风格”时,地域和民族特性的意义就大一些,但当我们提到“巴洛克风格”时,断代的含意比较明显,而“热带风格”、“舒情风格”和“儿童风格”呢?含义的区别是很大的。但专对学习绘画和研究绘画的人来说,“风格”的意义更多的是样式,效果和技法的特指。某一种风格的样式的形成过程,效果的演变转换,技法的成熟发展则是值得研究的问题。 瑞士医生融恩在他的《心理学与文学》一文中说:“《浮士德》是什么?它的本质是个符号。这意思并不说它所指出的东西都是众所周知的隐喻,而是说它所表现的只是早就存在于德国人的灵魂中的一些深奥的东西,歌德只不过是帮助它产生出来而已。认为艺术作品是完全的艺术家自身性格的再现是错误的。是《浮士德》创造了哥德,而不是哥德创造了《浮士德》。”尽管他在论述艺术的源山时,承认了艺术源于创造,但就他的这个著名的论断而言,他无疑否认了艺术家的个人因素,认为艺术家只不过是历史与时代生产艺术时的副产品,那么艺术家的使命仅仅是按照历史与刚代的要求复写风格吗?
Style is a unique and discernible manner taken or to be taken by a performer or creator, and the meaning is very complicated. For example, when we refer to “French style,” regional and ethnic traits are more meaningful. However, when we refer to “Baroque style,” the meaning of the dynasty is more obvious. However, the “tropical style”, “comfortable style” and “Children’s style”? The difference between the meaning is great. But for those who learn to paint and study painting, the meaning of “style” is more specific to style, effect and technique. The formation of a style of style, the evolution of the effect of change, the maturity of the development of techniques is worth studying. In his article “Psychology and Literature”, the Swiss medical doctor Ronn said: “What is” Faust “and its essence is a symbol, which does not mean that what it points out is a well-known metaphor, but rather To say that what it represents is something esoteric that has long existed in the soul of the Germans, and Goethe is nothing more than to help it emerge: It is wrong to suppose that a work of art is a complete reproduction of the artist’s own character, Germany ”created Gothic instead of Gothic creating“ Faust. ”" Although he acknowledged the origin of art from creation when he discussed the source of art, he undoubtedly had no doubt in his famous claim To deny the artist’s personal factors and to think that the artist is nothing more than a by-product of the art of history and production of the times, is the artist’s mission merely to rewrite the style according to the requirements of history and modernity?