论文部分内容阅读
围绕“未言说成分”概念的本体论地位、特性与功能的争鸣,充分反映了语境论与语义最小论关于意义、命题、真值乃至语义学/语用学界面等一系列语言哲学论题的不同立场。在各种形式的语境论愈来愈成为语言哲学研究中主导性取向的今天,句子意义的形式研究与言语行为性质的相对非形式研究愈加紧密地交织在一起,并不断推动研究重心从句子向话语转移。随之,语用充实的解释力更加显现。因此,在可预见到的未来,“未言说成分”这一概念似不可能轻易退出语言哲学的竞技场。
The contention of ontological status, characteristics and functions around the notion of “unspoken ingredient” fully reflects the fact that a great deal of linguistic philosophy, such as meaning, proposition, truth value and even semantic / pragmatic interface, The different positions of the thesis As various forms of contextualism become the dominant orientation in the study of language philosophy day by day, the formal study of the meaning of sentences and the relative non-formal researches of the nature of verbal behaviors become more and more intertwined, Transfer to discourse. Subsequently, the pragmatic explanatory power becomes more apparent. Therefore, in the foreseeable future, it is impossible for the concept of “unspoken ingredient” to simply withdraw from the arena of linguistic philosophy.