茅奖开评,质疑不断。茅奖揭晓,那质疑声又提高了若干分贝。但就我阅读所及,质疑中冲着作家、作品来的甚少,冲着作协去的极多。意者是要争个话语权吧。公平地说,也怪得对。操持奖项的人有点官员化,确是不争的事实,其例之一,便是这次在茅奖评审中说了一些衙门里的话,比如评奖要强调公平、公正,而为此又必须公开、透明云云。 Mao prize open evaluation, constantly questioned. The jackpot was announced, raising the questionable sound a few decibels. However, as far as I read, questioning writers, works to very little directed at the writers to go a lot. Interested parties want to fight a discourse right. To be fair, it’s weird. It is an indisputable fact that those who hold the prizes are officials. One of the examples is the remark made by the Yamen in the assessment of the Grammy Awards. For instance, awards should emphasize fairness and fairness, and this must be done in an open manner. Transparent.