论文部分内容阅读
在全球信息化的时代,仅仅靠组织与行政力量推行和维系主流意识形态已经远远不够,意识形态必须由传统的“管理”走向现代的“治理”。建构意识形态治理体系是发展我党现代执政能力的需要。文艺意识形态是上层建筑领域的主阵地之一,对待文艺意识形态治理应防止简单化、扩大化以及“左”右倾两种倾向。文艺意识形态治理应当建立新型运行体制,以及相应的运行机制。文艺意识形态的治理首先是相关主体的治理,这既包括部门主体,也包括个体主体。在此过程中还要注意打造文艺意识形态治理的人才团队,培养马克思主义文艺批评队伍。文艺意识形态治理必须把握治理时的分寸,讲究治理的方式、方法,在处置或处理文艺意识形态问题时要看对象与注意场合。对于文艺对象要通过文艺批评和文艺论争的方式去解决,对于文艺认识分歧要通过学术批评与学术争鸣的方式去解决;在处理文艺问题纷争时,一定要注意区分学术问题与政治问题的界限。
In the era of global informationization, it is far from enough to promote and maintain the mainstream ideology solely by the organizations and administrative forces. The ideology must move from the traditional “management” to the modern “governance.” Constructing an Ideological Management System Is Necessary to Develop Our Party’s Modern Governing Capacity. Literary and ideological ideology is one of the main positions in the field of superstructure. Preventive treatment should be simplified, magnified, and “left” and “right” inclined. Literary and ideological governance should establish a new operating system, and the corresponding operating mechanism. Literary and ideological governance is first and foremost the governance of related parties, which includes both departmental entities and individual entities. In this process, we must also pay attention to creating a talent team for literary and ideological governance and foster a contingent of Marxist literary and art criticists. Literary and ideological governance must grasp the propriety of governance, pay attention to the ways and means of governance, and look at objects and attention when dealing with or dealing with literary and ideological issues. For objects of literature and art, they must be resolved through the methods of literary criticism and literary controversy. Differences in understanding of literature and art must be solved through academic criticism and academic contention. When dealing with disputes over literary and artistic issues, attention must be paid to distinguish the boundaries between academic and political issues.