AIM:To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP) in patients with choledocholithiasis.METHODS:We systematically searched MEDLINE,EMBASE,Web of Science,and Cochrane databases for studies reporting on the sensitivity,specificity and other accuracy measures of diagnostic effectiveness of MRCP for detection of common bile duct(CBD) stones.Pooled analysis was performed using random effects models,and receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to summarize overall test performance.Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of studies using standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy and quality assessment for studies of diagnostic accuracy tools.RESULTS:A total of 25 studies involving 2310 patients with suspected choledocholithiasis and 738 patients with CBD stones met the inclusion criteria.The average inter-rater agreement on the methodological quality checklists was 0.96.Pooled analysis of the ability of MRCP to detect CBD stones showed the following effect estimates:sensitivity,0.90(95%CI:0.88-0.92,χ2 = 65.80; P < 0.001); specificity,0.95(95%CI:0.93-1.0,χ2 = 110.51; P < 0.001); positive likelihood ratio,13.28(95%CI:8.85-19.94,χ2 = 78.95; P < 0.001); negative likelihood ratio,0.13(95%CI:0.09-0.18,χ2 = 6.27; P < 0.001); and diagnostic odds ratio,143.82(95%CI:82.42-250.95,χ2 = 44.19; P < 0.001).The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.97.Significant publication bias was not detected(P = 0.266).CONCLUSION:MRCP has high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of choledocholithiasis.MRCP should be the method of choice for suspected cases of CBD stones. AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in patients with choledocholithiasis. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for studies reporting on the sensitivity, specificity and other accuracy measures of diagnostic effectiveness of MRCP for detection of common bile duct (CBD) stones. Pooled analysis was performed using random effects models, and receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to summarize overall test performance. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of studies using standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy and quality assessment for studies of diagnostic accuracy tools. RESULTS: A total of 25 studies involving 2310 patients with suspected choledocholithiasis and 738 patients with CBD stones containing the inclusion criteria. The average inter-rater agreement on the methodological quality checklists was 0.96. Pooled analysis of the ability of MRCP to (95% CI: 0.88-0.92, χ2 = 65.80; P <0.001); specificity, 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-1.0, χ2 = 110.51; ; positive likelihood ratio, 13.28 (95% CI: 8.85-19.94, X2 = 78.95; P <0.001); negative likelihood ratio, 0.13 (95% CI: 0.09-0.18, X2 = 6.27; (95% CI: 82.42-250.95, χ2 = 44.19; P <0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.97. Significant publication bias was not detected (P = 0.266). CONCLUSION: MRCP has high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of choledocholithiasis. MRCP should be the method of choice for more cases of CBD stones.